411.5 Safety and efficacy of PTA and stent placement for portal vein stenosis after pediatric liver transplantation; findings from the PORTAL registry

Lydia Sieben, Netherlands

MD/PhD candidate
Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and Radiology
University Medical Centre Groningen

Abstract

Safety and efficacy of PTA and stent placement for portal vein stenosis after pediatric liver transplantation; findings from the PORTAL registry

Lydia Sieben1,2, Bader A Alfares2,3, Henkjan J. Verkade1, Ruben H. de Kleine4, Hubert P.J. van der Doef1, Reinoud P.H. Bokkers2.

1Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; 2Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; 3King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 4Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands

PORTAL registry investigators.

Introduction: Portal vein stenosis (PVS) is a serious complication after pediatric liver transplantation (pLT) requiring revascularization. While percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and endovascular stent placement offer less invasive alternatives to surgery, their long-term outcomes remain unclear. This study aims to determine their efficacy and safety.
Methods: The study analyzed PTA and stent procedures (n>10) for PVS after pLT from the PORTAL registry, which comprises of a 20-year cohort from 21 centers across 18 countries. Outcome measures included technical success, adverse events (<30 days postprocedural), and long-term portal vein patency obtained with, and without adjuvant treatment.
Results: Among 239 patients with PVS, 207 underwent primary endovascular treatment (181 PTA, 26 stent), achieving technical success rates of 97% and 89% respectively (p=0.089). Adverse events did not differ (p>0.050), including bleeding (5%), thrombosis (3%), infection (4%), reintervention (2%), no retransplantation, death (0.5%) and other (3%). One-year patency rates were 75% for PTA and 84% for stents. Adjuvant secondary treatment after PTA was performed in 56 patients (1 conservative, 5 surgical, 50 endovascular) and in 5 patients after stenting (1 conservative, 4 endovascular). After PTA, secondary treatment with re-PTA achieved 78% one-year patency (n=35), while secondary stenting had a 100% patency rate (n=12, p=0.085). Over a 10-year follow-up, 97% of primarily PTA-treated vessels, and 100% of primarily stented vessels maintained patency or had it restored with adjuvant treatment (p=0.978).
Conclusions: PTA and stent placement demonstrate excellent safety and efficacy, even as reinterventions. Given its minimally invasive nature, PTA is a particularly favorable modality for addressing PVS after pLT.

References:

[1] pediatric liver transplantation
[2] vascular complications
[3] portal vein stenosis
[4] PTA
[5] endovascular stent placement
[6] safety
[7] patency
[8] percutaneous transluminal angioplasty
[9] treatment efficacy

Email: info@ipta2025.org
514-874-1717